(Congress Report) – The plot continues to thicken in regards to the Biden family bribery scandal, as individuals who are close to the current investigation into the FD-1023 file and its confidential human source have uncovered that then-Vice President Joe Biden and likely his son Hunter “coerced” a foreign national working for the Burisma energy company in Ukraine into paying them $10 million in exchange for political influence.
As per The Federalist, “On Monday, Sen. Chuck Grassley revealed a foreign national — identified by individuals with knowledge of the matter as Burisma founder Mykola Zlochevsky — allegedly possessed 17 recordings implicating the Bidens in a pay-to-play scandal. While 15 of the audio recordings consisted of phone calls between Zlochevsky and Hunter Biden, two were of calls the Ukrainian had with then-Vice President Joe Biden, according to the FD-1023.”
Margot Cleveland, writing for the outlet, said, “The Federalist has now learned the FD-1023 reported the CHS saying the Bidens ‘coerced’ Zlochevsky to pay the bribes. Sources familiar with the investigation also explained the context of Zlochevsky’s statements, and that context further bolsters the CHS’s reporting.”
In the now infamous FD-1023 form, dated June 30, 2020, the confidential human source provided a summary of earlier meetings he attended with Zlochevsky. Information from the CHS states that during the period between 2015-2016, the agency, which was advising Zlochevsky, spoke with the owner of the company and told him to stay away from the Biden family. After Trump trounced Hillary Clinton in the presidential election, the CHS then asked Zlochevsky if he was angry about Trump’s victory.
“Zlochevsky allegedly told the CHS he was dismayed by Trump’s victory, fearing an investigation would reveal his payments to the Biden family, which included a $5 million payment to Hunter Biden and a $5 million payment to Joe Biden. According to the CHS, the Burisma executive bemoaned the situation, claiming the Bidens had ‘coerced’ him into paying the bribes,” Cleveland declared.
The CHS replied to Zlochevsky stating that they were hoping he had taken the proper precautions to protect himself. He then allegedly described the measures he had taken to avoid being discovered, going on to stress he paid the “Big Guy” directly, then adding it would likely take a decade or more to completely unravel the money trails.
Zlochevsky then spoke about the audio recordings of the conversations he had with Joe Biden and his wayward son Hunter.
“The broader context of this conversation adds to the plausibility of Zlochevsky’s claims that he possessed recordings implicating the Bidens. And we already know from Grassley and House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer that the FBI considered the CHS, who relayed Zlochevsky’s claims to the FBI, a ‘highly credible’ source,” the report divulged.
Those who are close to the investigation assert that the bureau has already admitted the CHS’s intelligence information was not related to the information Rudy Giuliani had given to the Western District of Pennsylvania’s U.S. attorney’s office, which was the office that then-Attorney General Bill Barr had given the task of looking over any new information related to Ukraine.
Cleveland reveals that sources spoke with The Federalist and disclosed that investigators working out of the Pittsburgh office, along with looking over the information provided by Giuliani, also searched internal FBI databases and found an earlier FD-1023 document that was related to the CHS.
“That earlier FD-1023 then led to agents questioning the CHS on June 30, 2020, uncovering the details concerning Burisma’s alleged bribery of the Bidens,” Cleveland noted.
“What the FBI did to investigate the allegations is unknown, with sources telling The Federalist the bureau refused to either confirm or deny that the DOJ under Barr sent the FD-1023 to Delaware for further investigation. On the contrary, the FBI allowed Rep. Jamie Raskin, ranking member on the House Oversight Committee, to falsely represent to Americans that Barr and Pittsburgh U.S. Attorney Scott Brady had closed the investigation. Raskin’s deceit, tolerated by the FBI, forced Barr to publicly correct the record,” she added.
The bureau is refusing to give information on the steps they took to probe the claims that are contained in the document, if they took any at all. However, those sources who are familiar with the investigative procedures say there was not enough time between the June 30, 2020 interview of the CHS and the FBI headquarters’ closing of the assessment connected with the FD-1023 file in August of the same year to properly investigate the matter.
“While the FBI’s efforts to unwind the pay-to-play scheme seem to have been nonexistent, banking records released in May by the House Oversight Committee show congressional investigators are unraveling the complex web behind the Biden family business. Those records provide concrete evidence of a pattern of public corruption involving foreign nationals, with Joe Biden at the helm. There are still more banking records to review, along with the many details recently discovered when the whistleblower came forward with the FD-1023,” The Federalist stated.
Copyright 2023. CongressReport.com
Need to keep digging and get the goods on Ole’ Joe, poor old POS! Somebody needs to get a rope ready! FJB!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
People running around chasing the wrong problem & the wrong solutions.’
The problems in Washington are structural & not just Biden & The Democrats!
Biden fits right in because the Federal government was redesigned back in 1913.
Redesigned to accommodate liars & thieves like Biden!
If people don’t know of the suppressed history from that time,today’s problems in Washington are a mystery!
In 1913 the Bankers & financiers in London & Wallstreet,thru their stooge Woodrow Wilson,gained control of the USA by gaining control of America’s finances thru the Newly created Federal Reserve Bank.They who control the nations credit control the nation!
since then Washington has been the place that thieves like Biden head for to grow rich!
What President Trump did pertains more to the “Presidential Records Act” law, than if does to an “Espionage Act” law, for NARA claimed the same crimes by President Clinton when he left office and kept classified documents that he was storing in his ‘sock drawer’, and refused to return them to NARA, who then sued President Clinton in a federal court for the return of those documents.
The ruling from that judge in that federal court case, that NARA filed against President Clinton, to return the classified documents that President Clinton took and kept, set a precedent concerning Presidents keeping federal records when leaving office, classified or not.
That federal court ruling said that Bill Clinton, as President and under the “Presidential Records Act” law, has the right to keep any federal record he chooses, and as President also has the authority to declassify any of the documents kept at his discretion.
Joe Biden’s people claim that what Joe Biden did was not the same as President Trump has done, which pertains to the “Presidential Records Act”, not an “Espionage Act”, but Joe Biden’s case of possessing classified materials that is against the law for a US Senator or US Vice President to have outside a “SCIF”, which he would have to steal from to have in his possession outside a “SCIF”.
This is considered as stealing classified documents, which does fall under the “Espionage Act” law, not the “Presidential Records Act” law, since Biden was not President when he stole all those classified documents, at different times spanning almost four decades, never telling anyone that he stole them, and moved them several times to several different places, that never met the requirements for storing classified documents.
Over those nearly four decades, Biden has proven to be a “Serial Classified Documents Thief”, which is really classified as espionage by definition, and Biden should now be facing espionage charges, especially since an e-mail found on Hunter Biden’s “Laptop Computer from Hell”, that Hunter Biden had sent to a foreign agent that was practically verbatim, word for word, from a classified document found in Joe Biden’s possession, as the Biden’s have a reputation for plagiarism.
Biden’s people say that Joe Biden should not be charged for anything, because he voluntarily gave up what he stole, as soon as they found that Joe Biden had classified documents in his possession, and they only did this because Joe Biden had already ordered Merrick Garland to prosecute President Trump for having classified documents in his possession. But Biden had these documents, some from nearly 40 years ago, and never told anyone about them or offered to return them, before Joe Biden ordered President Trump to be criminally charged for having classified documents, and only after someone else learned that Joe Biden had these classified documents, but kept quiet about them for nearly 40 years.
This is similar to a bank robber, robbing several banks at different times, and hiding the money in different places, not spending any of it so nobody would become suspicious of him robbing banks by spending more money than he was earning at his job. Then someone discovered some of this stolen money at a place belonging to this bank robber, and so the bank robber pleads to the authorities to take the money back and not do anything about the robbery, but then someone else finds more money at another place belonging to the bank robber, and the bank robber pleads the same to the authorities, but then the authorities search other places the bank robber owns, and finds even more money, but the bank robber (like Joe Biden) says he shouldn’t be prosecuted for robbing banks because he voluntarily gave all the money back to the authorities. Should the bank robber be prosecuted, and if so, then why shouldn’t Joe Biden be prosecuted for stealing classified documents from many federal “SCIF”s for nearly 40 years?
But President Trump’s “trumped-up-charges” under the “Espionage Act” law should instead be prosecuted under the “Presidential Records Act” law, as President Trump had been negotiating with NARA about which documents he would return to them, and had already returned may boxes of documents to them, but was still going through the rest of his boxes to decide which documents he wanted to keep, the same as President Clinton had done, but NARA didn’t want to go to a federal court under the “Presidential Records Act” as they did against President Clinton and lost, and knew of the precedent set by that federal court case.
NARA knew they would lose again, so instead they colluded with the DOJ to have President Trump charged under the “Espionage Act” law, which they could get a subpoena under that law to immediately take the documents from President Trump, before he could decide which documents he wanted to keep, that NARA and the DOJ believed they may have a chance to win a case under the “Espionage Act” law, knowing for sure they would lose under the “Presidential Records Act” law, as that had already lost against President Clinton.
I wish they would do more than just talk about the BIDEN CRIMES. Seems you hear a lot, but no one does anything about it. Time to act.